Skip to content

The IOC and China: best friends forever

August 5, 2008

Addressing the world’s concerns about the International Olympic Committee’s (IOC) decision to give the 2008 games to China, the Chinese government made a string of promises, which included improved human rights, blue skies, and unfettered internet access, among others.

Of the promises that have been impossible to keep, the others have just been outright broken. And with the IOC in its uniquely powerful position, in what way has it held Chinese feet to the fire?  Well, they rolled over actually, accepted it as inevitable, and didn’t let any kind of principles get in the way.

The IOC of course has one eye, maybe both, on the money being chucked around at this spectacle.  £22 billion will be spent on the Beijing Games (about triple the cost of 2004), with £151m of that going just on the opening ceremony.

Little is to be allowed to get in the way of the Olympic juggernaut. Since China was first given the games, more than 1.5 million people have been ‘relocated’ and seen their homes demolished, to make way for the big makeover. The Geneva-based Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions (COHRE), already fuming at the IOC for completely ignoring China’s human rights record, stated,

[The] authorities have used tactics of harassment, repression, imprisonment and even violence against residents and activists

And it’s not just neighbourhoods that the authorities are trying to sanitise. There is even a ‘Capital Spiritual Civilisation Construction Commission’, who are policing the behaviour and dress of Beijing residents. No one is to give the visiting foreigners the slightest additional opportunity to criticise China.

But the ‘cleaning-up’ goes deeper, according to Amnesty International.

“We’ve seen a deterioration in human rights because of the Olympics,” said Roseann Rife, a deputy programme director for Amnesty International.

“Specifically we’ve seen crackdowns on domestic human rights activists, media censorship and increased use of re-education through labour as a means to clean up Beijing and surrounding areas.”

With guests just about to arrive, the Chinese government is apparently making really sure that skeletons in the cupboard are at least locked away.

The pollution that Beijing promised to tackle is still very much there.  After some degree of success (large industrial zones have been closed down for an unprecedented two-month summer holiday, cars are only being allowed into the city one day out of two based on odd- and even-numbered licence plates, while a million of the city’s 3.3 million cars were “taken off the roads” from July 20) air quality is still said to be nowhere near WHO safety standards.

Last year, the IOC’s chief Jacques Rogge warned that if air quality didn’t improve, it could lead to “the suspension of some events, particularly endurance races such as the marathon.”  Perhaps these words will be backed up with some spine, or maybe those over-zealous safety limits can be conveniently changed.

The question of visitors to the games being able to access the internet hit the headlines this week. Despite assurances that journalists at the games would be given unrestricted internet access, China went back on this promise too.  What did the IOC do in retaliation to this brazenly broken promise?  An IOC spokesman said that the IOC “regretted the limitations” but that they had negotiated with the Chinese that “some sensitive sites would be blocked on the basis they were not considered Games related.”  So if the Chinese communist party decide that you don’t need it, then it’s OK to prevent your access to it.  Well done, IOC, for taking such a tough stance against bullying.

Sun Weide, the chief spokesman for the Beijing Olympics organizing committee said “It has been our policy to provide the media with convenient and sufficient access to the Internet. I believe our policy will not affect reporters’ coverage of the Olympic games.”
Other sites were also unavailable to journalists, he said, without specifying which ones.

Sufficient, not complete. Meaning that you’re not welcome here, but we’ll put up with you for just about as long as we have to, then we’ll escort you to the exit. Once we’ve checked your bag.

Another concern that the Chinese government has is that of terror. Recent months have seen violence in Tibet between Tibetans and Han Chinese, in rural part of China between farming communities and authorities, and in the last few days in north-western Xinjiang where Uighur separatists, who hope to establish an independent Islamic state of ‘East Turkistan’, killed 16 policemen.

With the world’s eyes on Beijing, the government is concerned that opportunist terrorists will think now is their time. In response, Beijing is taking its security very seriously with “the deployment of 110,000 security personnel,”

Surface to air missiles have been placed around the Olympic “bird’s nest” stadium, and from 2pm on Friday – six hours before the opening ceremony is due to start – airports around Beijing will be in lock-down. The army has been instructed to shoot down anything that moves in the five designated air zones above the city.

Of course, this isn’t just about securing oneself in the face of a terrorist threat. It’s also a very handy opportunity to show those who you feel haven’t been showing you the respect you feel you deserve that you mean to take a place at the top table whether invited or not. China’s not asking for acceptance. It’s telling you outright to get used to it.

But Chinese President Hu Jintao has warned against making the Olympic Games political, saying “it would not help solve problems and bridge differences of view.

“Politicizing the Olympics goes against the Olympic spirit and the shared aspirations of people all over the world,” he said.

Which I guess means shut up and enjoy the show.

Advertisements
4 Comments leave one →
  1. August 6, 2008 8:23 am

    I’m really glad you posted this. The whole situation makes me sick. Giving the Olympics to China definitely validates a lot of bad behavior over the last decade or so. We’re certainly in store for more…

    Don’t get me wrong, I don’t hate China or the Chinese. I have travelled there many times and have been studying the language. Just don’t expect me to watch a single minute of this farce this time around.

  2. August 6, 2008 8:30 am

    Thanks for your comment Ted. Like you, I’ve nothing against the people of China, my quarrel is with certain policies of their leadership.
    And I agree, anyone who thinks that they’re going to “mend their ways” now is overlooking one very important thing – they have absolutely no need to now.

  3. Ian permalink
    August 7, 2008 4:57 am

    I wonder how many dissidents will get a visit from Special Branch on the eve of 2012?
    I’ve also heard rumbings of dissent from East London residents who are facing CPO action and undervaluing of property and businesses whilst the UK plunges on spending billions setting up the Olympics.
    How often are these stories repeated and underreported as the glory of the Olympic bandwagon moves on every four years?
    Too many countries have polticised the games for the good of their own regimes – Berlin, Moscow & Los Angeles all spring to mind.
    I view the games in 2 main ways:
    1) As a sporting event where the best athletes in the world will compete – and their endeavours aren’t political and are worthy.
    2) Their is just the chance that despite the whoring of the games by the IOC to this regime, and the undoubted abuses that will go on, that this attention on China will further open this country to the potential of change.

  4. August 7, 2008 9:43 am

    The thing that Londoners specifically and Britain in general should worry about is the coming recession. China spent 22 billion, the London games will cost more, no doubt. If that comes during or on the end of a deep recession, the repercussions will be felt long after.

    And you’re far more optimistic about China than I am. Neither the outside world nor the Games will determine whether China ‘changes’. Only the CCP will make that decision. And as they’ve been condoned, and given a global coming out party, why would they change? They’ve already proven they can get what they want without the need for change.

    The CCP don’t see these games as a chance to let the West in and check out China. Having Western journalists in is something they’re having to endure, which is why they’re being followed, watched and listened in on. What Westerners will get to see of China will be what China wants to show. To those who would argue that what journalists report can’t be controlled by the CCP, I would say, firstly, the majority of journalists will be sports reporters with nothing political to say anyway, and secondly, while they can’t control the words used, if they can control the places you go, the things you see, the people you speak to, then they very much control the picture that’s painted.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: